In addition, it is time to face the fact that our judicial system is prejudiced. For instance; in southern states, 8 percent of the black criminals who murder get the death penalty. Only 1 percent of white murderers get capital punishment. Also, murderers are seven times more likely to get the death penalty for murdering a white person as they are if they murdered a black person. This strikes me as blatant prejudice. Finally and most importantly, no one, including a judge, is perfect. What happens if a person is given capital punishment and evidence turns up later which reveals that this person is innocent?
If the "criminal" was put in jail, at least partial reparations could be made later. Obviously, if a person is given the death penalty, there is no turning back.
Indeed, it is not fair that murderers are often given parole after only a few years in jail. That is the reason that I would suggest those convicted of murder should be jailed for life with no option for parole. There are plenty of bridges and roads that need to be repaired. Let the convicted murderer work for the public good for the rest of his life. True, this will never make up totally for the misery of the victim's loved ones.
But at this point in time, it seems better than the alternative. I do this for you, and yes.. Positive things are more positive than negative things. A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies The man who never reads lives only one. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? These links will automatically appear in your email. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know.
We try to make TeenInk. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Don't have an account? Even if an individual is not capable of being rehabilitated, no one should have the right to sentence someone else to death. Under the current system of justice, the state can set, as a punishment, an action that has been considered to the worst sort of crime that a person can commit.
This seems to be completely illogical and contradictory. How can anyone possibly justify carrying out an action that is unanimously agreed upon being wrong?
The answer is no one; therefore the death penalty does not morally seem permissible. From a moral standpoint, the types of people that receive the death penalty are usually not physically or mentally fit to receive the punishment. One such group that has suffered from their mental disabilities are the mentally retarded. One of the reasons behind this high percentage is linked to the idea that people that are mentally retarded have a high desire to please figures of authority.
Taking that into consideration, it seems that one cannot in good judgment state that individuals that are in this group can reasonably be able to receive the death penalty considering their mental states. One of the other most controversial aspects of the death penalty comes in the form of flawed executions. However, for each method that has been used as a means to attempt to execute criminals, there have been flawed attempts that have caused severe pain and suffering for those that have had to endure the process.
The electric chair has reported several instances where multiple attempts were made to execute a criminal before the act was actually carried out such as with the execution of John Louis Evans III Haines. Even the more modern means of execution have their flawed attempts such as with lethal injection. The execution of Stephen McCoy in May of is a prime example of this. According to witnesses, McCoy reacted violently to the drugs administered to him and was seen gagging, violently coughing, and undergoing body contortions Haines.
Examples like this show that the systems that we have in place have serious flaws in them. From a moral standpoint, one cannot willing and with a clear conscious sentence an individual to an execution that may be cruel and unusual as that violates the Bill of Rights, which the judicial branch is charged with ensuring is never violated. A second argument that is given against the use of the death penalty is that it does not actually deter anyone from committing the crimes that result in receiving the punishment.
The basic argument that is made by individuals that support this form of punishment is that it makes an example out of those that commit these types of crimes and, therefore, will strike fear into the hearts of those that are thinking about attempting to commit the same sort of crime resulting in them rethinking their actions.
Unfortunately, this rational is taken with flawed logic. Those that receive the death penalty have usually committed the most gruesome, violent sorts of crimes that usually include one or more murders.
Further, those that commit these sorts of crimes are usually mentally unstable. These are the types of individuals that have no regard for the safety of themselves or that of others, and will act out their plans of actions regardless of what has happened in the past or present.
The hope of deterring these sorts of individuals by making an example out of a criminal will not really make a difference in their final actions. Empirically, one of the major rationales behind allowing the death penalty to remain is that the punishment will deter others from wanting to commit a crime.
Though ruling from a standpoint of fear is already morally questionable, the question remains: It would appear that it does not hold. Further, of the inmates that were on death row, only 65 of them were executed that year.
This staggering discrepancy of condemned to execution ratio can appear anything but frightening to the individual. The analysis that these two present appears to have a definite rational component to it, and the evidence suggests that the death penalty is not a deterrent to commit this type of crime. In another sample essay on the death penalty , we wrote that the death penalty was a modern tragedy because the deterrence argument does not hold up. Another argument against the use of the death penalty is the high cost that this process has on the taxpayers.
One would imagine that a life sentence in prison would be the most expensive punishment that an individual can receive, however the cost of execution is very expensive.
All the information provided must be supported by some authority. The death penalty is a heated debate all over the world. As a writer, you need to think and ask yourself some questions such as: What are the views of the countries that do not have the death penalty, in your opinion is it morally right to condemn someone to death?
What justifies death penalty? How are the families of the prisoner affected? Who should really face the death penalty? As you develop these questions, try to imagine what other people think of them.
The moment you develop such challenging questions, you will have started the process of developing an interesting topic for your research paper on the death penalty. Use your search engines to get sample academic papers that you can look at around your issue. This will further stimulate your thinking and get more information as you develop your idea. As this topic has been debated and explored before, there is a lot of material online that you can find. Going through several of these materials, you get a wealth of information that will help you to come up with a unique topic and piece of work.
The best materials to give you knowledge and information are the social media debates from where you can get different opinions and information. Considering how capital punishment is judged globally, you could know which side to base your arguments. It will be very important to note that:. Get the reasons as to why some countries have banned capital punishment while others are still practicing it.
Free Death Penalty papers, essays, and research papers.
This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue. I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the.
English Task –Argumentative Essay The Death Penalty The argument of whether the death penalty is effective is an age-old and contentious issue. This is a very long document. Please allow the page to load completely. DEATH PENALTY AND SENTENCING INFORMATION In the United States 10/1/
Get your research paper on the death penalty right. Tips and tricks on how to approach the paper or have it written in the right way within a short time. There are vast differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some oppose it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or.